Rapid Response: Anatomy of a Murder

Jimmy Stewart gives one of his most nuanced performances in “Anatomy of a Murder,” helping to elevate Otto Preminger’s film to one of the best courtroom dramas ever.

 

The casting of Jimmy Stewart in “Anatomy of a Murder” was a stroke of genius by Otto Preminger or whomever at Columbia dreamed up their pairing. Cast Humphrey Bogart and the tone mixed with the film’s already dark plot would’ve been too coldly grim for a courtroom drama, one more befitting a noir. Put another director in place, and Stewart’s performance turns away from the nuanced country lawyer with a sharp history and into the all too noble “aw, shucks”-ter he was always known for.

Maybe it’s Preminger’s cynicism that brings it out in him, but Stewart puts on one of the more unique performances in his career. He’s playing the sly, trickster always a few steps ahead and the smartest guy in the room, which is not usually the attitude of the humble defense lawyer in a movie such as this. Look at “The Verdict,” “To Kill a Mockingbird” or “12 Angry Men,” in which nobility shines through more than cunning. Stewart would’ve fit into one of those roles like a glove. But here he’s condescending of the witnesses on the stand, full of punchlines, playing the politics of the courtroom to his advantage, and only taking this murder case because it’ll give him a chance to get his feet wet against the current D.A., because he’s attracted to the defendant’s wife (Lee Remick) and because he’s not going to take any of his client’s (Ben Gazzara) crap.

Perhaps only Stewart would be able to nail this character, one who is acting not out of nobility but not out of sheer greed either, one who seems to be taking advantage of his situation, but also feels perfectly relatable, honest and even fatherly.

He helps to elevate “Anatomy of a Murder” to one of the best courtroom dramas ever made. It’s purely procedural, and it’s famous for its explicit discussion of rape, sex, panties and “spermatogenesis” in a Code-approved picture, but Preminger never goes for exploitation. Preminger denies us any of the explicit acts of violence used as the basis for the trial, which not only makes us suspect the truth later, but it also makes the courtroom scenes that much more effective and climactic. This is a film that only deepens in layers of intrigue as the plot goes on, and the whole thing feels just more devilish and suspenseful in the process. Continue reading “Rapid Response: Anatomy of a Murder”

Rapid Response: The Hustler

It occurred to me as I was watching “The Hustler” that you could never make a pool/billiards movie today. Not that you couldn’t make a sports movie with its similar structure, but 2011 in America is the wrong time and place for a movie about pool. How many people actually watch it, play it professionally, go to pool halls (is that even a thing anymore?) and least of all attempt to make a living by going around hustling other people through gambling?

That’s not to say “The Hustler” is dated, but the gravitas Robert Rossen’s film pays it seemed a bit much to me. Think of what are intended to be staggeringly dramatic shocks when Paul Newman as Fast Eddie Felson gets his thumbs broken or realizes that he won’t be playing the rich gentleman in straight pool but in billiards (who knew there was a difference?).

The film was nominated for nine Oscars, won two, put Paul Newman on the map as not just a movie star but a genuine A-lister (for that I am thankful as he is one of my favorite all-time actors) and inspired a quasi-sequel over 20 years later starring Newman, Tom Cruise and directed by Martin Scorsese. Continue reading “Rapid Response: The Hustler”